A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights while respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking during the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon from the prosecution against the petitioner and his over mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined with the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

Case regulation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. By way of example, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

maintaining the conviction awarded to the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Allow’s concentrate on what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.

Some pluralist systems, for example Scots legislation in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, will not precisely match into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems may well have been heavily influenced by the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted in the civil law tradition.

This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more

Even though numerous websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s critical To guage the credibility from the source before relying on the information.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered 302 ppc case laws by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same sort of case.

13309-B of 2010 being weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be viewed for the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, thus, confirmed custody in the petitioner in jail is unlikely to provide any beneficial purpose at this stage.”

competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them to generally be suit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)